Lexham Press

Blog

  • Biblical Languages
  • Biblical Studies
  • Theology
  • Church History
  • Pastoral
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • What We Do
    • Contact us

John’s Response to Proto-Gnosticism in His First Epistle

on June 4, 2015

Based on the internal evidence of 1 and 2 John, a problem had arisen within the church, possibly throughout Asia Minor. We know from church history that near the end of the first century, and in the early second century, proto-Gnosticism, specifically Docetism, arose within the church (Bruce, 16–17; Burdick, 61–63; Williamson, 50). In later years this developed into a theological system known as Gnosticism. Its teachings blended Greek dualism with Eastern mysticism. It adopted the dualistic view that only the nonmaterial, or “spirit,” was good while anything material was evil. Along with this came Eastern mysticism’s focus on secret knowledge reserved only for the chosen few. Though present in seminal form in the late first century, it blossomed into full expression in the middle and latter second century (Burdick, 54–60). By the middle of the second century its adherents were producing their own gospels and epistles, of which the Gospel of Thomas and Gospel of Judas are examples.

John appears to have anticipated Gnosticism’s development and threat to the health of the church and wrote to counteract its influence. Based on the Greek dualistic concept that matter is evil and spirit is good, Gnosticism concluded that for God to be truly good, He had to be pure spirit and could not have created a material universe. Therefore, a lesser god, an emanation from the true God, must have created it. The God of the Old Testament was one of these emanations that are called demiurges, and so was a lesser god than the ultimate God.

This form of dualism influenced their view of Jesus. Recognizing His deity, they concluded that Jesus could not have had a physical body. Corporeality would require God to come in contact with the “evil” material world. This teaching was called Docetism (from dokeo, “seem” or “have the appearance”) and claimed that Jesus only appeared to have a physical body, but in reality was a spirit and so did not suffer and die on the cross. He only appeared to have done so.

A modification of the Docetic view of Jesus was promoted by a false teacher in Ephesus named Cerinthus. His false doctrine, known as Cerinthianism, was an early form of adoptionism, and taught that Jesus was a human upon whom the “Christ spirit” descended at His baptism. It was this spirit of Christ that then empowered Jesus in His ministry. Then, just before Jesus’ crucifixion, the Christ spirit departed from the man Jesus, who subsequently died on the cross. So, while Jesus died, the “Christ” neither suffered nor died on the cross, but only appeared to have died.

Such phrases as what our hands handled (1:1), every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh (4:2), and He who came by water and blood (5:6) may imply that such a heresy as proto-Gnosticism is being addressed. Each of these references to Jesus uses incarnational language that requires corporeality—a physical existence, and so might indicate an early expression of Gnosticism. These statements served as John’s way of affirming the humanity of Jesus, whose deity John had clearly demonstrated in his Gospel. “The issue this epistle addresses is not that the heretics believed Jesus to be someone other than the Christ (and believed in Jesus anyway), but rather that they believed the Christ to be someone other than Jesus” (Akin, 54).

* * *

Adapted from 1, 2, & 3 John: Evangelical Exegetical Commentary by Gary W. Derickson. Through the end of June, the Logos edition of this volume is just 99 cents!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+

More from the Lexham Press blog

  • Get a Free Volume from the Evangelical Exegetical Commentary!Get a Free Volume from the Evangelical Exegetical Commentary!
  • Two New EEC Volumes Now AvailableTwo New EEC Volumes Now Available
  • The Longest Commentary on Jude Ever Published (and Other EEC Updates)The Longest Commentary on Jude Ever Published (and Other EEC Updates)
  • Who Authored the Book of Esther?Who Authored the Book of Esther?
  • The Vast Historical Context of 1 & 2 SamuelThe Vast Historical Context of 1 & 2 Samuel
  • A Female Apostle? Michael Heiser ExplainsA Female Apostle? Michael Heiser Explains

NEWSLETTER

EphesiansGet a free eBook of Ephesians: Evangelical Exegetical Commentary (EEC) by S. M. Baugh
when you sign up for our monthly updates. Be the first to hear about new releases, deals, and giveaways!

“This is now unquestionably the best technical commentary on Ephesians.”
— D. A. Carson, Research Professor of New Testament, Trinity Evangelical Divinity School

BLOG POSTS

Excellent PreachingSubscribe to our blog and get the free eBook of
Excellent Preaching: Proclaiming the Gospel in Its Context and Ours
by Craig G. Bartholomew

Search

Categories

Popular Posts

  • Lexham Press Welcomes New Books and Authors
  • The Monster Within
  • Link Love for the NIV Faithlife Study Bible
  • Unity through Diversity in the Church

Academic Catalog

Download Lexham Press Spring 2018 Academic Catalog

(9MB, PDF)

Review Copies

Request a Faculty or Media review copy
  • "These volumes not only provide helpful instruction on how to construct a theological lens through which to view al… https://t.co/IWgI5reOVe5 hours ago
  • In Flawed Perfection, Jeffrey A. Brauch demonstrates how a biblical understanding of humanity can help us navigate… https://t.co/ohrTvgvPJDyesterday
Lexham Press
1-800-875-6467
editor@lexhampress.com

Help

Contact us
Account
Orders
Email lists
Forgot password

About

About us
Business customers
Review a book
Manuscript submissions
FAQ

Copyright ©  2018 Faithlife | Logos Bible Software | Privacy

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get a free eBook of Ephesians: Evangelical Exegetical Commentary (EEC) by S. M. Baugh when you sign up for our monthly updates. Be the first to hear about new releases, deals, and giveaways!