Lexham Press

Blog

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • LexhamPress.com
  • Blog Categories
    • News
    • Biblical Studies
    • Theology
    • Pastoral
    • Christian Living
    • Church History
    • Biblical Languages
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • What We Do
    • Contact Us

Are Contextual Theologies Heretical Theologies?

on June 25, 2020

Asian North American (ANA) preachers read and interpret Scripture with a unique lens. We need a contextual hermeneutic of our own that will inform our homiletic.

But first, you may be wondering if there is a universal approach for interpreting Scripture. Do ANA pastors really interpret Scripture all that differently from members of other cultures? Wouldn’t a racially sensitive hermeneutic be susceptible to “liberal” or “misguided” interpretations? Put more strongly: Aren’t contextual theologies heretical theologies?

When one considers interpretive methods with respect to ANA contexts, some, inside and outside of ANA circles, might argue that there is no difference or should be no difference between how ANA pastors interpret Scripture and any other cultural group. “The gospel is the gospel in every context,” they say, and it’s true: the gospel never changes. The gospel is, in simple terms, the good news of Jesus Christ: his perfect and sacrificial life, death, burial, resurrection, ascension, and return. And while the historical-grammatical method of biblical interpretation taught in Western/North American evangelical seminaries stresses things with universal applicability like understanding biblical history, grammatical study, and literary context, it is also primarily or even exclusively filtered through a Western/Eurocentric/North American/white evangelical lens. White evangelical approaches to Scripture, in other words, represent the norm in North America.

As a result of this universalizing tendency, some white evangelical interpreters consider ethnic or non-white hermeneutics as suspicious, uncritical, and even promulgating heresy. By virtue of being in the majority culture, white evangelicals can claim a culture-free, attachment-free, baggage-free, and disclaimer-free understanding of theology and hermeneutics. Yet all readers of Scripture (including whites) interpret the text through their own cultural lenses that can “blind us to interpretations that the original audience and readers in other cultures see quite naturally.” Ethnic minorities trained in Western/North American seminaries often adhere to Western/Eurocentric/white models of hermeneutics.

In light of this situation, do we really need an ANA hermeneutic? Absolutely! ANAs who have been taught in Western/North American seminaries have too often functioned, in the words of sociologist Mia Tuan, as if settling for the title of “honorary whites” was the only option. The truth is, however, that we were never meant to purely replicate Western/white interpretative methods—as if Western/white interpreters do not wear their own set of culturally determined lenses. Rather, we should have our own culturally nuanced approaches to Scripture interpretation and application while still completely upholding a high view of Scripture. God has uniquely created us as ANAs, and I am arguing here for a faithful interpretation of Scripture that also includes greater racial and ethnic awareness and sensitivity. For non-ANAs, I am asking you to consider your ANA listeners’ cultures more intentionally.

I believe interpreting Scripture from only a Western/Euro-American evangelical theological framework omits necessary consideration of a bicultural or even multicultural ANA existence. It disregards God’s creativity and his plan for and celebration of ethnic and cultural diversity.

Contextualization, when done appropriately, is not hazardous to evangelical Christianity. Rather, it is imperative for interpreting Scripture faithfully in view of ethnic and cultural variances that cannot and should not be ignored.


This post is adapted from Finding Our Voice: A Vision for Asian North American Preaching by Matthew D. Kim and Daniel L. Wong (Lexham Press, 2020).

More from the Lexham Press blog

  • Bringing Asian Voices in the Church to LightBringing Asian Voices in the Church to Light
  • Preaching and the Need for Asian North American VoicesPreaching and the Need for Asian North American Voices
  • Addressing Racism in Light of the Image of GodAddressing Racism in Light of the Image of God
  • Know Your Bible Backward and ForwardKnow Your Bible Backward and Forward
  • Suffering and Wisdom in the Book of JobSuffering and Wisdom in the Book of Job
  • Follow the Life and Ministry of Paul in This New Visual GuideFollow the Life and Ministry of Paul in This New Visual Guide
5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

1 Comment
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Danny Zacharias
Danny Zacharias
2 years ago

This is a great post and I’ll be checking out this book. Theologians and biblical scholars need to understand that even using labels like “contextual theology” implies a standard theology to which the contextual theologies are compared. And the standard is set by western theology. The reality is that western theology is contextual theology too. Once that is de-centered, we can enter into vibrant conversations together in the church as we discuss how we in different cultures encounter the triune God.

0
Reply

Search

Categories

Recent Posts

  • A Book for Burned-Out Pastors | An Interview with Jeremy Writebol
  • Theopolis Institute Announces 2022–2023 James B. Jordan Prize
  • Our New Spring & Summer 2023 Catalog Is Here!
  • I’m a Christian—Now What?: An Interview with Aaron Armstrong

Spring 2023 Catalog

Lexham Press Spring 2023 Catalog

(PDF)

Review Copies

Request a Faculty or Media review copy
Lexham Press
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

- - Copyright ©  2020 Faithlife | Logos Bible Software | Privacy

wpDiscuz